مقاله Critical Discourse Analysis of Two Political Speeches in Light of Bakhtin”s Dialogism

توجه : به همراه فایل word این محصول فایل پاورپوینت (PowerPoint) و اسلاید های آن به صورت هدیه ارائه خواهد شد

 مقاله Critical Discourse Analysis of Two Political Speeches in Light of Bakhtin”s Dialogism دارای ۳۲ صفحه می باشد و دارای تنظیمات در microsoft word می باشد و آماده پرینت یا چاپ است

فایل ورد مقاله Critical Discourse Analysis of Two Political Speeches in Light of Bakhtin”s Dialogism  کاملا فرمت بندی و تنظیم شده در استاندارد دانشگاه  و مراکز دولتی می باشد.

توجه : در صورت  مشاهده  بهم ریختگی احتمالی در متون زیر ،دلیل ان کپی کردن این مطالب از داخل فایل ورد می باشد و در فایل اصلی مقاله Critical Discourse Analysis of Two Political Speeches in Light of Bakhtin”s Dialogism،به هیچ وجه بهم ریختگی وجود ندارد

بخشی از متن مقاله Critical Discourse Analysis of Two Political Speeches in Light of Bakhtin”s Dialogism :

سال انتشار : ۲۰۱۳

تعداد صفحات :۳۲

Bakhtin”s dialogism respects differences and appreciates dialogue. Different fields of the humanities are increasingly apprehending dialogism; however, few studies have applied it in the realm of critical discourse analysis. The present study presupposes that a fundamental similarity exists between dialogism and critical discourse analysis in their respect for different human voices to be heard. To present a study embracing dialogism in the given field, this research analyzed Martin Luther King”s “I Have a Dream” and Malcolm X”s “The Ballot or the Bullet”, as two leading political speeches in the history, using two master concepts of dialogism, self and other, in line with utterance, polyphony, centripetal and centrifugal forces and architectonics. The results showed that the explored political utterances were the locus of struggle between centrifugal and centripetal forces through which self-other architectonics in “The Ballot or the Bullet” appeared primarily in the form of binary opposition and relative dominance of one voice; in contrast, the architectonics in “I Have a Dream” showed various examples of polyphony and reconciliation of the voices. The domination of a single voice in the former and plurality of the voices in the latter yielded the speech utterances respectively as the monologic and dialogic utterances where covert maintenance of power in monologism, in contrast to dialogism, can serve the aim of critical discourse analysis to study the relation between discourse and power.