A Comparative Investigation of the Impact of E-Marketing Competitive Strategies on E-Loyalty with Focusing on Porter”s Model

توجه : به همراه فایل word این محصول فایل پاورپوینت (PowerPoint) و اسلاید های آن به صورت هدیه ارائه خواهد شد

 A Comparative Investigation of the Impact of E-Marketing Competitive Strategies on E-Loyalty with Focusing on Porter”s Model دارای ۱۰ صفحه می باشد و دارای تنظیمات در microsoft word می باشد و آماده پرینت یا چاپ است

فایل ورد A Comparative Investigation of the Impact of E-Marketing Competitive Strategies on E-Loyalty with Focusing on Porter”s Model  کاملا فرمت بندی و تنظیم شده در استاندارد دانشگاه  و مراکز دولتی می باشد.

توجه : در صورت  مشاهده  بهم ریختگی احتمالی در متون زیر ،دلیل ان کپی کردن این مطالب از داخل فایل ورد می باشد و در فایل اصلی A Comparative Investigation of the Impact of E-Marketing Competitive Strategies on E-Loyalty with Focusing on Porter”s Model،به هیچ وجه بهم ریختگی وجود ندارد

بخشی از متن A Comparative Investigation of the Impact of E-Marketing Competitive Strategies on E-Loyalty with Focusing on Porter”s Model :

تعداد صفحات :۱۰

چکیده مقاله:

Nowadays, in the goods and services market, retaining existing customers is more profitable than attracting new customers. Since latter costs more than the former, having loyal customers is now a major goal for many organizations. Also, with the development of e-businesses, creating this loyalty as eloyalty is highly important. The aim of this paper is to investigate the influence of each of the Porter’s strategy dimensions, including cost leadership, differentiation and focus, on loyalty in the context of e-business. In this regard, a questionnaire was prepared; subsequent to approving the validity of the questionnaire, it was randomly distributed among a random sample of 100 people who were potential and actual users of particular sites in the City of Isfahan. The findings indicate that, although focus strategy is more effective on creating e-loyalty, no significant difference was observed between the two other strategies in having more influence on eloyalty.