مقاله Conflict and Cooperation in Transboundary Watersheds–A Case Study of Helmand and the Dispute on the Kajaki Dam

توجه : به همراه فایل word این محصول فایل پاورپوینت (PowerPoint) و اسلاید های آن به صورت هدیه ارائه خواهد شد

  مقاله Conflict and Cooperation in Transboundary Watersheds–A Case Study of Helmand and the Dispute on the Kajaki Dam دارای ۹ صفحه می باشد و دارای تنظیمات در microsoft word می باشد و آماده پرینت یا چاپ است

فایل ورد مقاله Conflict and Cooperation in Transboundary Watersheds–A Case Study of Helmand and the Dispute on the Kajaki Dam  کاملا فرمت بندی و تنظیم شده در استاندارد دانشگاه  و مراکز دولتی می باشد.

توجه : در صورت  مشاهده  بهم ریختگی احتمالی در متون زیر ،دلیل ان کپی کردن این مطالب از داخل فایل ورد می باشد و در فایل اصلی مقاله Conflict and Cooperation in Transboundary Watersheds–A Case Study of Helmand and the Dispute on the Kajaki Dam،به هیچ وجه بهم ریختگی وجود ندارد

بخشی از متن مقاله Conflict and Cooperation in Transboundary Watersheds–A Case Study of Helmand and the Dispute on the Kajaki Dam :

تعداد صفحات:۹

چکیده:

In September 2001, Iran formulated a letter of protest to the Secretary General of the United Nations in which it expressed its discomfort about a spatial water dispute with Afghanistan concerning the river Helmand. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, while focusing on the multidimensional interplay between biophysical, socioeconomic and geopolitical influences affecting both conflicting parties, this paper will investigate as to why the Iranian decision to express the protest took place. In this context, this paper will begin with a brief contextualisation of the importance of Helmand within its catchment area. Next, initial approaches towards establishing an institutional framework for this transboundary watershed and water related events that ultimately led to a culmination of the spatial water dispute between Afghanistan and Iran in 2001 will be chronologically outlined and scrutinised in light of the first analytical purpose of this paper. Second and with reference to the previous findings, this paper will argue that that the Iranian decision to formulate the letter of protest to the Secretary General of the United Nations was justified in terms of international law because Afghanistan did not fulfil its legal obligations as a riparian state of Helmand.