SYMBOLIC ARTIFACTS IN PUBLIC SPACES AND ITS TERRITORY A COMPARISON (Isfahan Iran – Dhaka Bangladesh – Bogota Colombia)

توجه : به همراه فایل word این محصول فایل پاورپوینت (PowerPoint) و اسلاید های آن به صورت هدیه ارائه خواهد شد

 SYMBOLIC ARTIFACTS IN PUBLIC SPACES AND ITS TERRITORY A COMPARISON (Isfahan Iran – Dhaka Bangladesh – Bogota Colombia) دارای ۲۱ صفحه می باشد و دارای تنظیمات در microsoft word می باشد و آماده پرینت یا چاپ است

فایل ورد SYMBOLIC ARTIFACTS IN PUBLIC SPACES AND ITS TERRITORY A COMPARISON (Isfahan Iran – Dhaka Bangladesh – Bogota Colombia)  کاملا فرمت بندی و تنظیم شده در استاندارد دانشگاه  و مراکز دولتی می باشد.

توجه : در صورت  مشاهده  بهم ریختگی احتمالی در متون زیر ،دلیل ان کپی کردن این مطالب از داخل فایل ورد می باشد و در فایل اصلی SYMBOLIC ARTIFACTS IN PUBLIC SPACES AND ITS TERRITORY A COMPARISON (Isfahan Iran – Dhaka Bangladesh – Bogota Colombia)،به هیچ وجه بهم ریختگی وجود ندارد

بخشی از متن SYMBOLIC ARTIFACTS IN PUBLIC SPACES AND ITS TERRITORY A COMPARISON (Isfahan Iran – Dhaka Bangladesh – Bogota Colombia) :

تعداد صفحات :۲۱

چکیده مقاله:

The paper is based on an observation of the effect of symbolic artefacts in public spaces in three different cities of different countries. Extending some considerations emerging from the case study, the paper advances a reflection on the territorial dimension of artifacts in public spaces and the relationship between different artifacts, social relationships and the public domain. This task entails understanding different artifacts that are subject to both strategic and tactical uses, as well as the relationship between artifacts and the public domain as a territorial configuration. The article attempts to provide a concept of the uses of artifacts in public urban places/square as an instance of territorial formations. The main research aim was to understand how the artifacts in the square define themselves, and how it traces and own boundaries define its own styles. The case studies are from three different cities from three different countries. The countries and the cities are selected by the writer’s home country. The research analyzes three different public spaces in Bangladesh, Iran and Colombia